I watched Zack
Snyder’s Dawn of the Dead last night, which means that the
latter half of 300 is now the only part of his filmography I
haven’t seen (what a strange world this is), and I have some thoughts.
Mainly, how the
actual fuck did Zack Snyder end up with the reputation that he has?
Dawn of the Dead
is the first movie he ever made, so I wasn’t expecting greatness. And
I’m not going to lie - I didn’t love it. But mostly because I fucking
hate zombies. As a zombie flick, it’s effective. There’s a lot of
violence, but that comes with the territory, and for me it only
served to highlight how capable Zack Snyder is of going there
with the level of gore (this is really noticeable in Watchmen
too), and how much he holds back in his Superman films, which are
actually incredibly bloodless and
restrained. There are certain choices that I wouldn’t necessarily
have made, like how quickly we go
right into the zombie apocalypse, or the inclusion of a zombie baby,
but in both cases I get it. This movie doesn’t hold back. We all know
it’s a zombie movie, so why waste time, and
why not take that premise to its logical, appalling conclusion?
It’s
equally interested in both diving right into the action, and
exploring the emotional fallout of
your loved ones turning into zombies.
The female lead’s boyfriend is one of the first people to die, and
it’s suitably horrifying, but then she gets the fuck on with the
business of surviving. The
new guy she forms a tentative bond with over the course of the film
also dies, leaving her alive to mourn him.
As a directorial
debut, it’s startlingly competent. The tension is well-done, the gore
is obviously present but mostly happens in short intense bursts, the
action is gripping and satisfying, the pacing is surprising but not
frenetic, there’s lots of humour, the characters feel like real
people, and the cast is relatively diverse. The main character is a
young white woman named Ana, a nurse with no combat training, who
nevertheless holds her own during the apocalypse, and is one of the
few survivors in the end. She’s a nice person, but takes absolutely
no shit, even with a gun pointed at her face. For example:
“What are you, a
fucking doctor?”
“I’m a fucking
nurse.”
It features two
black men, both fully realized characters, one of whom is an ex-con
and one of whom is a police officer. The two of them have a
conversation about fatherhood, in which Andre, who used to be a petty
thief, talks about how much he wants to give his child all the
opportunities he never had. The police officer, Kenneth, is one of
the only other survivors of the movie.
Having seen this
film, I can now say with total assurance that literally 100% of
Zack Snyder’s movies feature at least one female lead whose agency,
psyche, and emotional ties are driving forces in the narrative.
Every single one of his films.
He gets compared to
Michael Bay - presumably because they both like explosions and went
to the same film school? - but it’s an utterly facile comparison.
Michael Bay’s films are generic, sexist, whitebread, empty-headed,
jingoistic, barely-concealed military propaganda pieces, and Zack
Snyder’s films… are not.
He should be
compared to Stanley Kubrick, Ridley Scott, the Wachowskis, James
Cameron, Alfred Hitchcock, Quentin Tarantino, Lars von Trier,
Terrence Malick… etc. I’m not saying any of those people are
perfect. Just that their movies are much more relevant points of
comparison than something like Transformers. This is a guy who
has been reading comics since childhood, whose mother was an artist, who studied art history
before he became a director, who had a team of linguists create an
entire Themysciran language just so they could inscribe a quote from
Joseph Campbell onto Wonder Woman’s sword, a detail we never even see
in the movie. Please tell me
when Michael Bay has ever done anything comparable.
Zack
Snyder makes genre films full of women and people of colour (occasionally even people who are both, if you can believe that). His movies are packed with action,
emotion, and beauty. They
depict violence without treating it lightly. His visuals – the one
thing people generally agree are impressive – only improve with
every movie he makes. His wife, Deborah Snyder, is his producing
partner, and obviously has a huge impact on his artistic endeavors.
He’s not without flaws, and he’s made films I don’t care for. But it’s
obvious when you look at his body of work that he is constantly
seeking to improve and try new techniques and delve just that little
bit deeper into every layer of storytelling and symbolism. Dawn
of the Dead is his first movie,
and it’s good. His latest work, Batman v Superman,
is a triumph. I can’t fathom where his reputation as this
self-fellating, macho, ultra-violent director, who is somehow both
‘too gritty/dark/grim/edgy’
but also ‘exactly as frothy
and shallow as Michael Bay’
came from, but it’s both
self-contradictory, and
straight-up false.
As
a quick sidebar: I really, truly, honestly wish my guy Zack would do
me a solid and hold back a little
less with the sex and the swearing in his Superman films. He clearly
knows how to do it well. Also, this movie made me a bit sad Michael
Kelly didn’t show up again as Steve Lombard in Batman v
Superman, which
is not an emotion I ever expected to feel.